Friday, May 22, 2009

Carnal Christian

All,

I give up...I can't post on my own site on any of my computers...why?

Discuss carnality with me...Mark and Wayne are saying some curious things about carnality...both seeming to think Christians can and cannot be carnal.

What is your take? I think 1 Corinthians 3 is overwelmingly clear...am I alone on this one?

Grace,

Fred

P.S. I do think there is no way to avoid Christians sinning...which begs for, "Why would the Holy Spirit let us sin at all?"...and..."If we can sin some by the Holy Spirit's permission, then why not a lot?"

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Free Grace Voices From the Past

Hey,

Bob suggested we collect some of our favorite quotes from Free Grace voices of the past...who do you like? What did they say? What do you like about it?

Thanks,

FRL

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

The History of the Free Grace Movement

Hi,

What makes someone Free Grace?

I have a few friend who are suggesting that I'm unfair in saying that GES is no longer in the Free Grace Movement because it disagrees with earlier Free Grace leaders. Of course, disagreeing isn't the issue...but disagreeing with a fundamental is. I put the gospel in as one of the fundamentals. In my Open Letter I mentioned the following from Lewis Sperry Chafer:

Preaching the gospel is telling something about Christ and His
finished work for them which they are to believe. This the simplest
test to be applied to all soul-saving appeals. The Gospel has not been
preached until a personal message concerning a crucified and living
Saviour has been presented, and in a form which calls for the response
of a personal faith. (Salvation, p. 101).

Naturally, this quote is quite at odds with what Zane Hodges and the GES Gospel maintain. Even though they might insist that they 'preach the cross'...Dr. Chafer would say that they MUST preach the cross. My argument is that the GES folks have cut themselves out of history by cutting historical leaders out on what the gospel is.

Though other disagree, I think what is at issue is the simple fact that if we can all disagree about anything 'free grace'---then there actually is not definition available.

What would you consider the essentials to be? Also, do you think I've been unfair in appealing to history?

Thanks much,

FRL